Anger is at best the strategem of those whose powers of persuasion are so mediocre that they cannot find another expedient to achieve their desired purpose. Almost unfailingly, those who can retain a cool head during the heat of an argument will be better-equipped to create rational arguments - and that's another thing, the rationality: As we get angrier, the vast majority of us retrogress into a baser level of rationality - our abilities to reason and create logical arguments is severely diminished when we allow our calmness and cool-headedness to be compromised by someone attempting to agitate us.
When it comes down to it, anger has no place among the arguments of the rational. That's not to say, mind, that it's evitable: The best man or woman among us is still but a man or a woman, and our nature is wont to decline into ireful babblings when the specific core beliefs each of us hold dear are threatened.
homage to dr. strangelove?
ReplyDeletealso, i'm not sure all anger is bad. certainly control must be kept and perhaps manage it's release. is getting angry the problem or losing control of that anger that's the destructive force?
ReplyDeleteoh yeah
ReplyDeletei love your use of language
Whoa...I didn't notice these. Yeah, I was hoping someone would catch the Strangelove reference there. but yeah, you're right - it's less anger itself that's negative (because after all anger can be used constructively) and more the loss of control over anger.
ReplyDelete